Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Critique free essay sample

Statement of the problem/obJectives c. Significance of the study e. Review of related literature Methodology a. Materials/equipment b. Treatment/general procedure Result and Discussion Conclusions Recommendations historical approach to the development of physical theories and technologic dvances is adopted to highlight the humanistic aspect of science. In many instan evolution of concepts, principles and theories is described to make you aware oft contributions of some great physicists and technologists in pushing forward the frontiers of knowledge. Physics is the branch of science that deals with the interaction between matte and energy. Understanding of its basic principles enhance your daily life and the application of physics principles pave the way to development. Life situations wh these physical theories meaningful. Technological devices are presented to keep abreast with advances in science and technology. These will help people to cope the demands of the knowledge based society of the century. Internet is a big help for those people who wants to gather knowledge in physi in a more convenient and easy way. Aggregate production and expenditures as part of the Multiplier Model were not comfortable subjects for most of us. One team member helped by describing bank deposits and loans as money multipliers. Someone deposits money in their bank account and receives a printout that states how much in the account. The person is allowed to get the money back on demand. However, the bank is allowed to borrow out 90% of that money, only holding 10% in reserve. That 90% is where the money begins multiplying because more money will be in the economy, and more money will come back to the bank. Here is the formula that is used to show how this works: 1/r = 1/. 10 = 10 Simple money multiplier If the reserve rate is too high, then the money multiplier is smaller and less money will be created. In 2008, banks became afraid the loans were not safe and kept the excess reserves, which crushed the money multiplier. Here is another formula that is used to figure out the money multiplier for the economy: (1 + c) / (r + c) r = the percentage held in reserve c = the money held by the people The more money people hold, the smaller the money multiplier. Another member explained that the Multiplier Effect can be defined as the expansion of a countrys monetary supply that has resulted from banks being able to lend. The size of the multiplier effect actually depends on the percentage of deposits that banks are required to hold as reserves. Money is used to create more money. This is calculated by dividing total bank deposits by the reserve requirement. Another of the objectives this week was to assess the factors that contribute to the establishment of general and specific rates of interest. Quite a few factors determine general and specific interest rates. For example, the Federal Reserve raises or lowers short-term interest rates in effort to maintain a stable economy. In addition, interest rates are strongly influenced by the state or condition of our economy and the supply and demand for credit. When the demands for funds are high, interest rates will rise and put a ceiling on the funds that are available. Lastly, inflation also affects rates of interest. The higher rate of inflation, the more interest rates have a tendency of rising. The material in week three was a little hard for most of us to comprehend at first. However, after going over the material a few times, and participating in discussions, it was a little clearer. Now, as one team member suggests, we can use the information to help understand how 401k and bonds are affected when interest rate is either lowered or increased. We can apply this information to our borrowing habits. We can make better decisions by understanding the state of our economy and how the Federal Reserve will affect our investments.

Sunday, April 5, 2020

Which Sources of Knowledge- Books free essay sample

Which sources of knowledge- books, web sites, the media, personal experience, authorities or some other- do you consider most trustworthy, and why? In this essay I will be looking at the statement above in relation to the problems of knowledge, using where appropriate my experiences as a knower. To determine which source of knowledge one can claim to be the most trustworthy one would have to define them all first. The proposed sources are: books, websites, media, personal experience and authorities. After I have defined each source of knowledge, I will be looking at the reliability of each source, helping justifying my findings with the help of the problems of knowledge we have identified in class. Truth plays a large role in considering which source of knowledge is the most trustworthy. With truth there are many problems involved, for something to be true it has to be believed to be true and there have to be good grounds for it to be believed to be true. We will write a custom essay sample on Which Sources of Knowledge- Books or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This links to perception, truth I think largely depends on the way one perceives it to be reliable. . . When talking about books one can already distinguish between the fiction and nonfiction books. Fiction is usually defined as fantasy and non real yet sometimes the author of the book makes it seem like non-fiction. This makes it sometimes hard for the reader to say if it is fiction or not. Due to the fact that fiction is fantasy it can be said that it is not considered to be true. Therefore fiction is not trustworthy as a source of knowledge. The other type of book is non-fiction. In the Oxford School Dictionary it is defined as writings that are not fiction; books about real people and things and true events. With this one can already identify a problem of knowledge: how can one say that something is true or not? Yet it has become a type of to deem worthy in society that nonfiction books are seen as reliable sources of knowledge. With these non-fiction books one must always be aware of possible biased authors. Things such as cultural background, age and religious beliefs will influe nce the perception of the truth. Books can be reliable as sources of knowledge, but I do think that one will have to consult more sources than only books to get a larger overview and more reliable view Some of the main sources include: books, the Internet, the media, personal experience and authorities. Between the sources mentioned above, all except personal experience are known as second-hand knowledge. This means that the knowledge is obtained through others’ research and observations. It is a way of sharing knowledge. Although all these sources are frequently used and are important they have restrictions and should not just be accepted as it may not be true knowledge as it may not be justified. Because of this, some sources are more trustworthy than others. One of the most common sources of knowledge is through books. Books are usually very trustworthy as experts write them and have knowledge on that specific subject matter. They are authorities on the subject. Although, we should not always rely on what the experts say as it may not always be true. For example, in science, new discoveries are being made everyday therefore the â€Å"knowledge† we thought to have had on the subject is wrong and is therefore not knowledge. For example Biology is one subject you might want to trust the newer editions, as the knowledge will be more valuable than an older edition. Other common source is the Internet. We all use it but it is not as trustworthy as a book. Wikipedia, allows anyone to write and edit the pages. Therefore how can we know that this new knowledge is true? As well, many sites created today are not generally written by experts and could therefore be false. There is no control over what is written. As well, people judge the reliability of a site based on its appearance. How do we know that the most trustworthy sites are the ones that look good? We don’t. Therefore the Internet is not a very trustworthy source of knowledge. The media can be a trustworthy source and could also be one of the least trustworthy sources. This all depends on the types of media. If the media consists of celebrity gossip then how do we know its true? Usually, the goal of this type of media is to attract the attention of the viewers. If we are talking about news media, this source of knowledge is generally trustworthy. But, we should be aware that there usually is some bias in the stories presented to us. Some people are repeated sources of information. Such information, however, is always second-hand knowledge or third-, fourth-, or nth-hand knowledge. It is all hearsay. The further it is removed from our own personal experience, the more caution we must exercise before accepting a fact/claim. All of our historical knowledge is acquired in this way as is most of our knowledge of the sciences. We cant experience the past or personally repeat every experiment, so we must trust the specialists and accept, though not blindly, the discoveries they record for us. They key thing with knowledge from authority is that it can be double-checked and the work of scientists and historians is continually being ‘double checked’ as other workers in the same field (even sometimes us in our classrooms) repeat their experiments or investigations. A healthy suspicion of sources, the development of the skills required to check facts and an awareness of which sources are more or less reliable is a good way to ensure that the knowledge we receive from authority is good, but can be modified to a certain extent. In some cases I don’t trust/ believe what the authority says. For example, fighter jets are in battle and a jet is shot down. The head of the operation will tell the press that it was a unfortunate training exercise, this is what happened in China January 2011. This is done to avoid conflict. I’m not saying that the authority is not trustworthy, I’m saying that sometimes you have to speculate the information and think to yourself if its trust worthy. Personal experience differs from these other sources of knowledge, as it is not second-hand knowledge but the original source of knowledge. Even though this knowledge is gained through own personal experience it is not trustworthy by itself. Combined with knowledge obtained by others this knowledge becomes the most trustworthy of all the sources. I consider to be the most trustworthy is personal experience. I believe that personal experience is a trustworthy source because I would have been there to see and experience the event that had taken place in history first hand. I would have been able to tell my story from a first hand perspective about what had just happened. Personal experience could reach others through the media who would spread my story to everyone so that they to would understand what happened or what I had just observed. Personal experience could also be passed down from one generation to others enabling oral records to be passed down as trustworthy sources of knowledge. This would be considered trustworthy because it had come from within the family and had been told by a trusted member of ones family. Thus this is why I consider personal experience to be trustworthy. Though this is only one side of how personal experience can be considered to be trustworthy. Psychologists throughout history have discovered that these personal experiences such as eyewitness records are not trust worthy sources. According to Elizabeth Loftis â€Å"eyewitness records or personal experiences are not to be trusted because of the fact that memories are reconstructed and can be altered with the use of prepositions†. Bartlett discovered that memories are reconstructed to fit ones diagram making it easier to understand the story from their own perspective. Therefore memories are reconstructed, though key details are remembered and often overstated creating a story that is not accurate.

Sunday, March 8, 2020

Mass Media Effect Essays - Digital Technology, Media Technology

Mass Media Effect Essays - Digital Technology, Media Technology Mass Media Effect The Effect Mass Media has on America 5/25/2015 What would the world do without media? Mass media has not only taken over America, but the whole world. The way we receive mail, gossip about the hottest celebrities, or even the different ways we can hear the presidents speech, have all changed in a drastic way over the last 100 years. The effect that mass media has had on America has its pros and cons, but nonetheless, we could not live without it. The radio was surprisingly the first media outlet to make a boom in America. Gugliemo Marconi actually created the first radio called the wireless telegraph in 1895. The object he used to transmit sounds waves through mores code is now called a radio. The newspaper was first printed in Boston on September 25, 1690. It was edited by Benjamin Harris and printed by Richard Pierce. This was how people received news about what was going on around the world and how they were kept up to date with the latest scandals. The television was created in London in the 1920s, but the television was not actually introduced to the United States until the late 1940s. The internet was created in the United Kingdom by Tim Berners-Lee in the 1980s. It was not popular in America until the mid-1990s. The internet and the television have to be the two most watched and used source of media. Allowing people to use their mobile device to access media is the most important way media has evolved. The radio is used for so many things. Although the radio may be dying out, it still holds a permanent spot in Americas heart. People listen to audio books on the radio and music. People check the weather, win contest, hear the traffic report, and even have in-depth conversations through the radio. The newspaper, also slowly dwindling away, was the very first tabloid. It reported crimes and scandals nobody wanted to be leaked. Anything that a reporter heard that sounded juicy and could possibly cause some controversy went on the front page. Now the television, also called the TV, is still one of the most popular ways to receive media. With the press of a button and thousands of channels, it is now the modern way to get the news. The TV offers not only news, but entertainment that can keep an individual occupied for hours. The internet allows one to browse websites, read/post blogs, watch videos, know all the hottest celebrity news and even help with school work. The internet is the qu ickest way to find out information about anything ever imagined. Media convergence is the evolution of IT and its connection to computing and how media has been enhanced on the internet. As stated before, the internet is used for everything and media is on the top of the list. Sites like YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram make the internet a must have in all homes and now even in restaurants, airplanes, hotels, and bookstores. Without media, the internet would still be popular but not to the extent it is now. All the websites named before were not as advanced as they are now. They each have upgraded their sites with a broader platform for media. With videos, picture, open blogs, and news reports, the internet and media go hand in hand. When it comes to the effect that mass media has had on America, only thing that can be said and that is it has taken over completely. It has taken our minds and even our bodies. The radio is slowly dying because people can now go on their mobile devices and read, or watch what is happening. Everything is evolving so fast and America does not know what is coming next. This is why media literacy is so important in media consumption today. Not everything heard or seen is true and somethings may be decieveing in the media and culd get someone harmed. Being mindful and taking safety precautions will help lower the chances of anyone getting harmed. Even with all the pros mass media has on America, there are still cons, but America just cannot get enough. References History of the Internet. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Internet History of

Friday, February 21, 2020

Management report regarding the financial performance of the National Essay

Management report regarding the financial performance of the National Folk Festival Ltd for year ended 30 June 2007 - Essay Example Net Working Capital is therefore the difference between current assets and current liabilities. (Carey and Towers-Clark 2011) Working capital is relevant since it is a measure of the firm’s liquidity and efficiency because it involves all current assets and current liabilities. (Adams 2006) It is a reflection of the results of a number of other company activities like revenue collection, inventory management, payment to suppliers and debt management. A positive working capital in a firm would be an indicator of its ability to pay off its short-term obligations quickly. On the other hand, a negative working capital indicates that the business is struggling to pay off these short-term liabilities fast enough. (Atrill and McLaney 2011) In the case study of National Folk Festival Ltd, its working capital position for both 2007 and 2006 can be evaluated and compared. The comparison is to ascertain how liquid the firm was in these two years. The working capital of the company can be calculated as shown below: The year 2007 had a higher working capital than 2006. This means that in the year 2007, National Folk Festival Ltd was more liquid than in 2006 since it had more money to pay off its short-term liabilities as and when they fell due. A closer look at the current assets and liabilities for both years reveals that in 2007, the company had more current assets and fewer current liabilities compared to 2006. This was what attributed to the higher working capital in 2007 than in 2006. A comparison of the income statement items for the years 2007 and 2006 shows that the company made significant improvements in 2007. In Appendix 1, a variance analysis shows the increase or decrease of incomes and expenses from 2006 to 2007. An increase in income or decrease in expense is a favourable variance while a decrease in income or an increase in expense is an adverse variance. The tickets sales in the year 2007 were higher than

Wednesday, February 5, 2020

Has the Bush Administration made America more Safe as a Result of Research Paper

Has the Bush Administration made America more Safe as a Result of Exporting Democracy - Research Paper Example Export democracy bears semblance to colonization albeit in an indirect way. In medieval democracy, the Athenians, the French revolutionists, and the Russian Bolsheviks felt that the level of democracy and freedoms in their states was superior to that in the nations around themi. They, therefore, sought to influence and bring changes to the governments that neighbored them. In a way, the principle of export democracy played a role in instigating the process of colonization all over the world. For instance, Europe felt that their system of governance was the best and worth being assimilated world over. As history holds it, America adopted the western system of governance from its colonizers; it adopted its administrative system embedded on democracy with the freedom to vote and be voted for enjoyed by every citizen. With economic developments, the country became a world super power being both an economic power house and an epitome of political democracy. The feeling that the political system in the country had matured enough led the nation’s leader to believe that the system of government in the country was thus the best and could be adopted by other nations. In 1994, at the end of the Second World War, democracy was considered a giving to the Americans from the Europeans. The Italians were the major benefactors of this. When the Italian cities were being literally by the allied forces, a key participant of which was the United States, so did the reign of Nazi rule come to an end. The Nazi regime was an extremely authoritarian system that was led by a dictatorial leader; after its ousting, democracy was adopted in Italy instigated by Americans. The Italians incorporated democracy in their system of governance. It was a period of war it was not easily noticeable that the system of governance was being changed. In addition, the government could not resist the change since it had all its forces on the war front. For a country to completely change or influence the governance of a second nation, conflicts would arise leading to diplomatic ties being revoked. There are two ways through which a country influences the governance of anotherii. The first, which is diplomatic, is the imposition of conditions before giving out aid to the country. A superior economy would demand that certain changes be made in the system of governance before they send aid to the country. This has is used by governments even to date. The only condition that affects the use of this strategy is that the country that is to be changed has to be a weaker economy or in need of aid for these conditions to be met; this has always worked in the developing countries that always need aid the most yet they have the most autocratic systems of governance. The second strategy is the direct attack of a given government in an attempt to deliver the populace from the rule that is considered unfriendly. This would always lead to war and there would always be casualties. However, wit h international bodies at alert to object to such acts, the process would end up facing criticisms as a crime against. Furthermore, after all these, the preferred system would end up not being assimilated as in the long run the people are left to govern themselves. Bush’s Administration and Exercise of Export Democracy Bush was elected to office in 2001. His election was on a republican ticket. His

Tuesday, January 28, 2020

Ethics of the US in the Vietnam War

Ethics of the US in the Vietnam War Aaron Sanders I think that OBrien says that courage is something that is gained once and as you encounter times where you have to break through your fears to do what is right, your courage slowly gains. His specific point of, stashing it away alternatively shows that you have to not be courageous all the time. He says that We must steadily increase our moral capital in preparation for that day when the account must be drawn out. meaning that there is that one time where all of your previous experiences that gained you courage, now lead you past a major barrier, unlike anything you had ever dealt with before. I wasnt exactly that surprised that he was a coward to enter the war, mainly in the sense that this was a war that many people had been opposed to, OBrien specifically stated on page 38 that, I was drafted to fight a war I hated Young, yes, and politically naive, but even so the American War in Vietnam seemed to me wrong.. If you dont want to do something, like go to war, then, of course, you were cowardly. Do I agree on these grounds? Yes, and No. First off, this is possibly the choice between living as a coward for the rest of your life, or by joining your brothers as they get slaughtered in the jungle a whole hemisphere away from home. Both sides of which I have an equal opinion for. It may be cowardice to not join in a fight overseas, but at least you get to live out your life at home but be labeled a coward. I also think though that you shouldnt be forced to fight for a cause that you dont believe in. However, if you get drafted, then you do have a moral obligation to go and fight for Americas beliefs. If you are drafted, you should think about the broader impact of what you not answering the draft call entails. When America enters a war it is always supposed to be for what is right. If you then dont answer that call you aid the enemy because they have a more dedicated military and citizen population all fighting for what they believe is right. Shame has a major role within the lives of the soldiers, because they feel that killing people is shameful and something that no one should have to do, or watching a buddy die and feeling as though you couldve stopped it. OBrien especially feels shame after he killed his first Viet Cong soldier, [Kiowa] told me that it was a good kill, that I was a soldier, and this was war, that I should shape up and stop staring Sometimes I try to forgive myself and other times I dont. (OBrien, 127-128). I would say that heroism and stupidity is both a result of the shame they feel. Heroism is shown in the sense that it gives the soldiers something more to fight for. Take the Alpha company after Kiowa died, Move it, [Mitchell Sanders] said. Kiowas waiting on us'(OBrien, 160). They had all felt shame that he had died in such a cruel way, having drowned in the villages latrine during a mortar strike. After that he is used as a rallying cry for the rest of the soldiers. However shame also caused stupi dity, The next morning [Rat Kiley] shot himself. He took off his boots and socks, laid out his medical kit, doped himself up then shot himself in the foot. (OBrien, 212) Rat was so shamed by the war that he would do anything to get out of it, even shoot himself in the foot. Its sad the lengths someone would go to rid themselves of the burden of shame. It ends up being stupid what it will drive them too, it may not even be a conscious decision that pushes them off the edge though in Rat Kileys case he fully made the decision. Shame can and should be used though as a rallying cry of sorts, because it gives you a reason more powerful than anything else to make the shame go away. In my mind the relationship that OBrien is talking about, between shame and courage is that the shame in life helps you grow courage if you use, like in question 3, put it away and let it grow. These little acts of heroism that may even seem like stupidity at times, though but not stupidity in the sense of shoo ting yourself in the foot or injuring yourself in other ways, but it is these acts of heroism that will grow your courage. After reading the chapter entitled Speaking of Courage and then getting sort of an analysis in Notes, the effect is actually quite powerful. I felt as though what OBrien had explained in Notes about some parts being fake and others real, couldnt take away from the empathy that I had developed with Norman. I think since some parts had to be fabricated, it actually made it more connectable mainly in the sense that you have a character in a town that takes you along and makes you feel what he is feeling through him reliving the memories. He had to keep thinking to himself because no one had let him just spill his guts, and its just an emotion mix of loneliness and shame. The feeling of shame of The truth, Norman Bowker wouldve said, is I let the guy go.' (OBrien, 147). My appreciation actually doesnt change for the story. The important parts are completely there and they are backed up by incredibly life-like storytelling, a town that doesnt feel much at home, and just being alone with t he thoughts of the character as he relives one of his most shameful moments. With Notes after it, the message of just how lost Norman was feeling that late evening on July 4th as he drove around the lake becomes painfully clear, [OBrien] received a long, disjointed letter in which Bowker described the problem of finding a meaningful use for his life after the war. (OBrien, 149). This reality check that Mr. OBrien put into the first few paragraphs of Notes really hit home what soldiers that come home from the war filled with shame and confusion really put up with. For me Speaking of Courage was really sealed as being completely true in my mind when Mr. OBrien said Speaking of Courage was written in 1975 at the suggestion of Norman Bowker, who three years later hanged himself in the locker room of a YMCA in his hometown in central Iowa. (OBrien, 149). I think Norman ending up committing suicide after all of his pain and suffering finally got to him, fit with how Speaking of Courage en ded, with him deciding that,. It was a pretty good show. (OBrien 148), it was this easing of pain that he wanted so badly after witnessing his best friend and comrade drown while he just stood and essentially watched helplessly, that made him decide to hang himself. Overall I think that Mr. OBrien really made me appreciate Speaking of Courage by making it believable with just the powerful simplicity of the complex feelingsÂÂ   Norman was experiencing. It was this simplicity that made it so easy and believable to be Norman, and feel what he was feeling. His narration of the reasoning behind how he got the idea also added to the authenticity because he tried to make it sound as though Norman was telling his story, perfectly relaying what he felt at every revolution around that lake. WORKS CITED OBrien, Tim. The Things They Carried: A Work of Fiction. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2010. Print.

Sunday, January 19, 2020

Employment Law Essay -- UK Employment Law

In order to discuss and analyse the above statement, in depth reference will be made to various documents which can in some circumstances relate to contracts of employment and whether those particular documents which are not contractual can be incorporated into a contract, creating legal enforceability for employers and employees. Firstly it must be established what exactly is a contract of employment. A contract of employment is an agreement between an employer and employee, forming the basis of an employment relationship; enforceable by law. Contracts of employment may be given orally or in writing: Employment Rights Act 1996 s 230(2) and commence immediately. Actual written contracts require an employee's signature and the signature of a company representative. Contracts of employment can involve both express and implied terms and can appear in many forms. The express terms, being those which both parties have agreed to, whether by signing a contractual document or acting in a particular way are seldom found in just one document. Terms are repeatedly found in an array of documents, whether they be from the actual formal contract, written statements or an employee handbook. The two latter documents are just some examples of prima facia non contractual documents. In reality very few employees have a formal written contract of employment , but to whom the act does apply: must receive a statement setting out the key particulars of their employment in writing within two months of commencing employment . Written statements are known as the Terms and Conditions of Employment: essentially evidence of the contract, providing clarity for both employee and employer but it is not the actual contract of employment per se. A written statem... ...ent of an employment contract. This is likely to be troublesome point for some time to come and likely to work on case by case basis. Works Cited Employment Rights Act 1996 s 230(2) (n1) s 1 Ian Smith and Aaron Bake, Smith and Wood’s Employment Law (10th edn Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010) 80 [1974] ICR 420 CA Smith and Baker (n3) 81 John Bowers, Bowers on Employment Law (6th edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2002) 39 [1972] 2 QB 455 Smith and Baker (n3) citing Lord Denning MR per (n7) [2006] EWCA Civ 1277, [2006] IRLR 961 Slade and 11 KBW, Tolley’s Employment Handbook (24th edn, LexisNexis 2010) citing (n9) (n9) University of London External Programme ‘Chapter2 The contract of employment’ http://www.londoninternational.ac.uk/current_students/programme_resources/laws/subject_guides/labour_law/lablaw_ch2.pdf